2020年9月29日より「Dont't Go Back to The 石炭!」のコンテンツは、「Japan Beyond Coal」に移行しました。URL:beyond-coal.jp

Don’t go back to the 石炭〜石炭火力発電に反対 |石炭発電|石炭火力発電|反原発

広島の石炭火力発電所のリプレイスに向けた動きに住民から不満の声Local people concerned over move towards replacement of coal-fired power plant in Hiroshima




2号機(1974年運開)は1号機の石炭灰処分場に、さらに残る石炭灰処分場と、日本の典型地形である東川のカプス状三角州にあった民家、畑を買収した土地に、3号機を増設します。 新1号機計画では、新たに取得した工場跡地に貯炭場を建設するため、発電所西隣の民家が発電所敷地と新設貯炭場に挟まれる配置図が示されました。けれども、何も具体的な計画が示されなかったため、電発の関連会社である(株)開発肥料竹原工場からの低周波振動の被害に悩まされた住民は不安をかきたてられ、方法書に対して多くの意見を提出します。




竹原新一号機のCO2排出原単位は0.785kg/kWhと報告されており、年間の排出量は330万トン以上となる見込みです。今年10月28日には、環境大臣が環境影響評価準備書に対する意見書を提出していますが、「2050年においても稼働していることが想定されることから、将来の二酸化炭素回収・貯留(Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; CCS)の導入に向けて、設置までのスケジュール等を念頭」にし、「必要な措置を講じること」などが盛り込まれています。 しかしこの件について、11月1日に開催された環境審査顧問会火力部会では、委員から指摘が出たものの、「CCSの手法が確立されていないので対応のしようがない」との説明がされ、アセスの中では対応できるものではないとの方向でまとめられるようでした。







環境審査顧問会火力部会第三回資料(平成25年8月2日) http://www.meti.go.jp/committee/kenkyukai/safety_security/kankyo_karyoku/h25_03_haifu.html

竹原火力発電所新1号機設備更新計画に係る環境影響評価準備書に対する環境大臣意見の提出について(環境省報道発表 2013年10月28日)

連絡先 広島県竹原市忠海床浦3-18-8 松田宏明方 電話 0846-23-2029

The environmental impact assessment for J-Power’s Takehara coal-fired thermal power plant’s new No. 1 unit (600 MW) in Hiroshima is progressing at an exceptional speed. The Hiroshima Prefecture Geinan Area Thermal Power Plant Prevention Liaison Committee fears that deliberations could finish with loose ends. Because it is a replacement, it is considered optimistic if environmental conditions improve dramatically.

It goes without saying that coal-fired power plants produce large amounts of CO2 and there is concern that the increased usage of low grade coal* could contribute to environmental pollution problems such as heavy metals like mercury and PM2.5 emissions. In addition to these concerns, there are also local problems.

The Takehara power plant is very close to residential areas.Problems began at the time of the construction of the No.1 unit in the 1960s. In order to lower reclamation fees, the power plant’s south seawall was moved from the former shoreline to its current location. Since then, the expansion of the power plant area has continued to eat up private land. The Plant’s No. 2 unit (which started operations in 1974) had used land from No. 1 unit’s coal ash disposal site. Likewise, the No. 3 unit expanded through the acquirement of private property (homes and farmland) on the Higashigawa delta and remaining coal ash disposal sites.

According to the layout plans of the new No. 1 unit, because a new coal storage facility will be built on a newly acquired old factory site , private property west of the power plant will be sandwiched between the power plant and the new coal storage facility. However, since a concrete plan had not been shown, many citizens were worried about the effects of low-frequency oscillation from Kaihatuhiryo Co ., a subsidiary company under J-Power. Therefore, many opinions were expressed against the scoping document.

Land negotiations began in the fall of 2011 when the environmental impact assessment began. Before the assessment was complete, the power plant company started sending out eviction notices. Residents voiced their anxiety and indignation about the noise, vibration and the lack of sunlight the construction will cause. This puts the meaning of the environmental impact assessment in question.

Once a power plant is built, it runs for at least 40 years. Will the plant’s operator consider the impact it will have on neighboring residents up to the year 2060? Based on experiences thus far, it is highly necessary to consider these problems carefully.

Written by: Hiroshima Prefecture Geinan Area Thermal Power Plant Prevention Liaison Committee

Additional comments by the secretariat of “sekitan.jp”:

It was reported that the CO2 emission per electricity generation of Takehara power plant’s new No. 1 unit is 0.785kg/kWh. It expected that annual emissions will be more than 3.3 Mt-CO2. On October 28th, 2013, the Minister of the Environment submitted his opinion on the preparation document of environmental impact assessment in which he stated that “because the plant is expected to run even to 2050, the future introduction of CCS (CO2 capture and storage) and its installation schedule should be considered” and “necessary measures should be taken.”

However, at an environmental assessment advisory meeting on November 1st, it was explained that “because CSS methods have not yet been established, there is no way it can be included in the assessment.”

*Low grade coal refers to sub-bituminous coal with a low degree of carbonization but also includes coal with high ash and high sulfur content.

Rendering of Takehara coal-fired thermal power plant’s new No. 1 facility



Related links: (All information is in Japanese):

Hiroshima Prefecture – Eco Hiroshima Environmental Information Site: New plan to replace equipment of Takehara thermal power plants’s new No. 1 unit


Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry: Environmental impact assessment for Takehara thermal power plant’s plan to replace the new No. 1 unit’s equipment

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry: Environmental assessment advisory group’s third document (August 2nd, 2013)

Ministry of the Environment: The Minister of Environment’s opinion on the environmental impact assessment of Takehara thermal power plant’s replacement of new No. 1 unit’s equipment

Hiroshima Prefecture Geinan Area Thermal Power Plant Prevention Liaison Committee
Contact: Hiroaki Matsuda, Tel: +81 846-23-2029
Address: Tokonoura 3-18-8, Tadanoumi, Takehara city, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan